Ethical Dilemma?
Hey Guys!
Something new to blog about!
I was in a chat room the other day (hey - don't judge me, no-one was on msn!) And one girl from Australia asked me if I'd mind filling out a survey for her religious studies assignment. I had nothing better to do with my time, so I obliged.
In short, it was a questionnaire that asked my opinion on many ethical issues that divide the masses. Two of the most difficult issues were abortion and euthanasia - I was still thinking about them hours after I'd emailed the survey back. I did however, finally, come to a conclusion.
Abortion and euthanasia are incredibly sensitive issues, and both bring a lot of trauma to those who have to come into contact with either of them. When I tried to decide whether or not either should be allowed, I realised that I really can't decide. They both have such strong points on either side of the argument that it is near impossible to come to an impartial conclusion - one ethic that is superior to all others - one moral that everyone should live by.
Therefore, why decide? Why should we try to pick out that single ethic? When you look at the diversity of race, culture and belief in the world, it seems a stupid idea to try to make everybody conform to the same moral rule.
Take my opinion for example. I really tried to imagine how I would feel if I was pregnant yet not ready for children, and I struggled to decide whether I would ever consider abortion. I then realised that I'll never be able to make that decision unless I actually face it. Ultimately I know that I would end up basing that decision upon how I felt, as my feelings would be the only consequence of that decision for me. Sure people would possibly judge me, but again, with the diversity of opinion and belief surrounding the subject it is certain that I would be judged by somebody, whichever choice I made. In the end, I would just have to make the decision that I thought I could live with the most easily. After all, I'd be the person who'd have to live with it for the rest of my life; the people whom thought that their opinions should govern my decision would move on and find someone else to "advise" the second my decision was made.
My decision however could be completely different to one faced by someone in exactly the same situation. She could do exactly the same as me, deal with the problem using exactly the same method and base her choice upon her feelings - but she could still end up making the completely opposite choice.
So Which one of us would be right?
Whichever of us made the decision that matches your beliefs of course. But your beliefs will be completely different to somebody else's, probably even someone else who leaves a comment on this blog. So which one of you is right? Looks like we're back to square one.
When you think about it, as long as we'd both made the decisions that were absolutely right for us personally, who’s to say that either of us made the wrong choice? Why should someone else’s ethic or belief rule over the feelings of someone who actually faces the situation?
The purpose of this post is not to say whether abortion or euthanasia is right or wrong, but to convince you all that maybe there's no right or wrong answer to either. In the end both are incredibly personal matters, and as far as I'm concerned, if opinion, belief, faith and most importantly human emotions can stretch to both answers, the governing ethic should too.
Something new to blog about!
I was in a chat room the other day (hey - don't judge me, no-one was on msn!) And one girl from Australia asked me if I'd mind filling out a survey for her religious studies assignment. I had nothing better to do with my time, so I obliged.
In short, it was a questionnaire that asked my opinion on many ethical issues that divide the masses. Two of the most difficult issues were abortion and euthanasia - I was still thinking about them hours after I'd emailed the survey back. I did however, finally, come to a conclusion.
Abortion and euthanasia are incredibly sensitive issues, and both bring a lot of trauma to those who have to come into contact with either of them. When I tried to decide whether or not either should be allowed, I realised that I really can't decide. They both have such strong points on either side of the argument that it is near impossible to come to an impartial conclusion - one ethic that is superior to all others - one moral that everyone should live by.
Therefore, why decide? Why should we try to pick out that single ethic? When you look at the diversity of race, culture and belief in the world, it seems a stupid idea to try to make everybody conform to the same moral rule.
Take my opinion for example. I really tried to imagine how I would feel if I was pregnant yet not ready for children, and I struggled to decide whether I would ever consider abortion. I then realised that I'll never be able to make that decision unless I actually face it. Ultimately I know that I would end up basing that decision upon how I felt, as my feelings would be the only consequence of that decision for me. Sure people would possibly judge me, but again, with the diversity of opinion and belief surrounding the subject it is certain that I would be judged by somebody, whichever choice I made. In the end, I would just have to make the decision that I thought I could live with the most easily. After all, I'd be the person who'd have to live with it for the rest of my life; the people whom thought that their opinions should govern my decision would move on and find someone else to "advise" the second my decision was made.
My decision however could be completely different to one faced by someone in exactly the same situation. She could do exactly the same as me, deal with the problem using exactly the same method and base her choice upon her feelings - but she could still end up making the completely opposite choice.
So Which one of us would be right?
Whichever of us made the decision that matches your beliefs of course. But your beliefs will be completely different to somebody else's, probably even someone else who leaves a comment on this blog. So which one of you is right? Looks like we're back to square one.
When you think about it, as long as we'd both made the decisions that were absolutely right for us personally, who’s to say that either of us made the wrong choice? Why should someone else’s ethic or belief rule over the feelings of someone who actually faces the situation?
The purpose of this post is not to say whether abortion or euthanasia is right or wrong, but to convince you all that maybe there's no right or wrong answer to either. In the end both are incredibly personal matters, and as far as I'm concerned, if opinion, belief, faith and most importantly human emotions can stretch to both answers, the governing ethic should too.
